Reported
Information supplied by a source but not yet independently verified.
The Labs record connects the request, execution conditions, observed behavior, technical analysis, review decision, correction history, and release state. A score without that chain is an observation, not an acceptance record. This page defines the standard; it does not claim that every record already exists.
These terms separate source claims, direct evidence, interpretation, review decisions, and approved release.
Information supplied by a source but not yet independently verified.
Behavior or state directly present in preserved artifacts or execution records.
The same material behavior observed again under documented conditions.
An interpretation supported by evidence but not directly observed as a fact.
An accountable disposition recorded after review of evidence and limitations.
A version approved for its stated public or commercial use.
Five layers preserve enough context for another qualified reviewer to reconstruct the decision.
Stable program, task, environment, evaluator, attempt, and release identifiers connect every artifact to one version.
Source, rights posture, author, reviewer, timestamps, revisions, and supersession preserve who changed what and why.
Model, harness, tools, seed, network policy, resources, and environment state make attempts comparable.
Commands, outputs, artifacts, evaluator results, requirement outcomes, and intervention points preserve what occurred.
Findings, corrections, limitations, disagreements, approvals, and disposition explain why a state advanced or stopped.
An accepted unit must carry the artifacts necessary to inspect scope, validity, behavior, and accountability.
Capability question, task contract, starting state, constraints, acceptance criteria, and approval boundaries.
Authorship, source history, permitted evaluation, training, demonstration, and redistribution uses, holdout status, confidentiality review, and unresolved restrictions.
Dependencies, images, services, reset procedure, health checks, tools, network, and resource profile.
Verified expected behavior, legitimate alternatives, expected artifacts, and known non-goals.
Requirement-to-test map, reward semantics, invalid-state handling, control coverage, and shortcut or exploit checks.
Every valid, invalid, retried, or intervened run with versioned conditions, reward components, and artifact links.
Observed outcome, competing explanations, evidence, interventions, classification, and confidence.
Independent reproduction, findings, adjudication, corrections, limitations, and accountable sign-off.
Version, date, disposition, superseded record, regression impact, and rerun or regrade decision.
The ledger is the join between the released package and the analysis. It prevents selective reporting and incomparable aggregation.
These rules keep attractive summaries from outrunning the underlying record.
A passing subscore cannot be presented as complete-task success.
Attempts from materially different task or evaluator versions are not silently aggregated.
Broken setup, service incidents, corrupted state, and unauthorized interventions are classified separately.
The successful rerun does not erase the earlier attempt or the reason it was repeated.
Missing evidence remains unknown; it is never converted into a passing state.
Review ends in an explicit state with a named owner and next action.
Evidence is internally consistent, independently reproducible, and sufficient for the stated claim.
The intended work remains valid, but a correctable defect requires another validation cycle.
A material dependency, rights, infrastructure, or evidence issue prevents interpretation or sharing.
The package cannot validly measure the intended capability or meet the release standard.
A public claim must identify the artifact, version, date, reviewer, evidence, observed result, and limitation it relies on.